Ads Brain Advertiser Readiness And Minimum Viable Budget Framework

Document Type: Framework
Status: Active
Version: v1.0
Authority: Ads Brain Governed By MWMS HeadOffice
Applies To: Advertiser Readiness, Paid Traffic Launch Readiness, Minimum Viable Testing Budget, Budget Sufficiency, Scope Control, Allowable Loss, Conversion Lag Funding, Scaling Capital Separation And Campaign Launch Governance
Parent: Ads Brain Canon
Last Reviewed: 2026-07-19

Purpose

The Ads Brain Advertiser Readiness And Minimum Viable Budget Framework defines whether an advertiser, offer, campaign and operating environment are ready to enter paid traffic testing.

Paid traffic should not begin merely because an advertising account exists.

A campaign may be technically launchable while remaining commercially, operationally or evidentially unready.

Underprepared advertisers often produce weak results because:

tracking is unreliable
the offer is unclear
the funnel is incomplete
the creative is insufficient
the test scope is too broad
the budget is too small
conversion lag is ignored
fulfilment is weak
customer support is unprepared
allowable loss is undefined
scaling capital is confused with testing capital

This framework exists to prevent underfunded or structurally unready campaigns from producing false conclusions.

Its purpose is to:

determine advertiser readiness
determine campaign launch readiness
define minimum viable testing budget
match budget to expected acquisition cost
match budget to conversion lag
control test scope
separate testing capital from scaling capital
define allowable loss
prevent too many variables sharing too little spend
protect tracking, creative, offer, funnel and fulfilment readiness
distinguish platform minimums from MWMS evidence requirements
govern launch, reduce scope, delay and reject decisions
preserve capital
improve evidence quality
align Ads Brain with Finance Brain, Affiliate Brain, Experimentation Brain, Conversion Brain, Product Brain, Customer Brain, Data Brain, Compliance Brain, Risk Brain and HeadOffice

Scope

This framework applies to:

advertiser readiness
campaign launch readiness
paid traffic test readiness
minimum viable testing budget
budget sufficiency
testing capital
scaling capital
recovery capital
reserve capital
allowable loss
maximum approved exposure
expected CPA
expected qualified CPA
conversion lag
attribution lag
test duration
creative count
audience count
placement count
product count
offer count
geography count
campaign count
test scope
operational capacity
fulfilment readiness
customer support readiness
sales capacity
stock readiness
tracking readiness
creative readiness
offer readiness
funnel readiness
compliance readiness
launch decisions
scope reduction
launch delay
test rejection
readiness records
readiness review

This framework does not govern:

final capital approval
direct platform setup
technical implementation
final offer approval
final compliance authority
autonomous campaign launch
autonomous budget changes
autonomous scope changes
autonomous scaling
autonomous rejection of an advertiser relationship

Those remain governed by Finance Brain, Affiliate Brain, Product Brain, Conversion Brain, Compliance Brain, Risk Brain, HeadOffice and related systems.

Definition / Rules

Core Principle

Paid traffic requires enough readiness and enough budget to produce interpretable evidence.

A campaign that cannot generate sufficient conversion opportunity should not be treated as a valid commercial test.

A small budget is not automatically a problem.

A budget becomes insufficient when it cannot support the declared objective, scope and evidence requirement.

Advertiser Readiness Definition

An advertiser is ready for controlled paid traffic when the following are sufficiently established:

offer
funnel
tracking
creative
commercial economics
operational capacity
compliance
testing capital
decision authority
rollback readiness

Advertiser Readiness States

Approved states are:

Unreviewed
Not Ready
Conditionally Ready
Ready For Limited Test
Ready For Controlled Testing
Ready For Scaling Review
Paused
Revalidation Required

Unreviewed

No structured readiness assessment has been completed.

Not Ready

Material conditions prevent a valid or safe launch.

Conditionally Ready

The advertiser may proceed only after named conditions are resolved.

Ready For Limited Test

A narrow test may proceed within a restricted budget and scope.

Ready For Controlled Testing

The advertiser is ready for a structured paid traffic test.

Ready For Scaling Review

The advertiser has completed controlled testing and may enter separate scaling review.

Paused

Testing or launch is temporarily suspended.

Revalidation Required

Material conditions changed and the readiness decision is no longer current.

Readiness Rule

Readiness must be assessed before launch and revalidated after material operational or commercial change.

Advertiser Readiness Layers

Advertiser readiness should be assessed across:

Strategic Readiness
Offer Readiness
Funnel Readiness
Tracking Readiness
Creative Readiness
Audience Readiness
Budget Readiness
Commercial Readiness
Operational Readiness
Compliance Readiness
Decision Readiness
Recovery Readiness

Strategic Readiness

The advertiser should know:

campaign purpose
business goal
campaign role
target market
success criteria
failure criteria
primary metric
guardrail metrics
decision authority

Strategic Readiness Rule

A campaign should not launch where the objective is simply:

run ads and see what happens.

Offer Readiness

The offer should have:

clear product or service definition
clear buyer
clear promise
clear price
clear value proposition
known availability
known restrictions
known payout or margin
known refund or cancellation exposure
legal and policy readiness

Offer Readiness Risks

unclear promise
weak differentiation
poor buyer fit
unavailable product
unstable pricing
weak margin
unapproved claims
traffic restrictions
fulfilment mismatch

Offer Readiness Rule

Cost controls and targeting cannot rescue an offer that lacks commercial viability.

Funnel Readiness

The funnel should provide:

correct destination
message match
functional landing page
mobile usability
acceptable page speed
working forms
working checkout
working booking flow
working payment
confirmation states
source of truth capture
customer support path

Funnel Readiness Risks

broken forms
slow pages
payment failure
mobile incompatibility
message mismatch
missing confirmation
unclear CTA
poor trust
tracking breaks

Funnel Readiness Rule

Paid traffic should not be used to diagnose basic technical failure that could have been identified before launch.

Tracking Readiness

Tracking should include:

defined conversion event
event firing validation
deduplication
value accuracy
currency accuracy
product identifier integrity where relevant
attribution settings
conversion lag understanding
source of truth
reconciliation ability
tracking confidence

Tracking Readiness Rule

A campaign should not scale or activate advanced bidding controls where tracking is unreliable.

Creative Readiness

The campaign should have enough creative to support the declared role.

Creative readiness may require:

clear concepts
sufficient variation
correct format
placement adaptation
compliant claims
proof
CTA
source asset quality
production capacity
iteration capacity

Creative Readiness Rule

The required number of creatives depends on:

campaign role
platform
budget
audience size
placement coverage
learning objective

More creative is not automatically better.

Too many creatives can dilute spend and prevent learning.

Audience Readiness

Audience readiness should consider:

target buyer clarity
geography
first party data quality
exclusion needs
overlap risk
audience size
campaign role
broad targeting suitability
compliance
customer status

Audience Readiness Rule

Audience scope must remain compatible with the available budget.

Commercial Readiness

Commercial readiness should define:

allowable acquisition cost
break even acquisition cost
target acquisition cost
break even ROAS
target ROAS
contribution margin
payout
commission
refund risk
cancellation risk
fulfilment cost
support cost
cash timing
repeat value
customer quality
allowable loss

Commercial Readiness Rule

The advertiser should know what result is commercially acceptable before launch.

Operational Readiness

Operational readiness should include:

stock
fulfilment
sales capacity
lead response capacity
customer support
booking capacity
refund handling
cancellation handling
reporting capacity
escalation ownership

Operational Readiness Rule

A campaign should not generate demand the advertiser cannot fulfil safely.

Compliance Readiness

Compliance readiness should include:

platform policy
claim support
restricted category review
privacy
consent
audience use
customer list use
geography restrictions
offer terms
promotion accuracy

Compliance Readiness Rule

Commercial opportunity does not override compliance.

Decision Readiness

Decision readiness requires:

named campaign owner
named commercial authority
named financial authority
review cadence
success condition
failure condition
pause condition
rollback rule
escalation path

Decision Readiness Rule

A campaign should not launch without knowing who can:

continue
pause
change scope
approve more budget
stop the test

Minimum Viable Testing Budget

Minimum viable testing budget is the smallest realistic amount of capital required to produce interpretable evidence for the declared test.

It is not:

a platform minimum
a universal daily spend
a course creator recommendation
a competitor benchmark
a guess

It should be derived from:

expected acquisition cost
expected qualified acquisition cost
conversion rate
required conversion opportunities
number of variables
test duration
conversion lag
attribution lag
audience size
placement count
geography
evidence requirement
allowable loss

Minimum Viable Budget Rule

A test should not launch where the available budget cannot create a realistic opportunity to answer the declared question.

Budget Sufficiency Formula Logic

Budget planning should consider:

Expected Cost Per Desired Event
×
Required Number Of Desired Events
+
Allowance For Delivery Variance
+
Allowance For Conversion Lag
+
Allowance For Learning And Exploration

This is a planning model.

It is not a fixed mathematical guarantee.

Budget sufficiency must still be reviewed against:

campaign role
platform conditions
commercial boundaries
test complexity
operational risk

Platform Minimum Versus MWMS Minimum

Platform Minimum

The lowest amount the platform will technically accept.

MWMS Minimum Viable Budget

The lowest amount that can produce useful evidence for the declared objective.

Platform minimums should not govern MWMS test design.

A campaign may be technically launchable while being evidentially invalid.

Testing Capital

Testing capital is the amount approved to create evidence.

Testing capital may fund:

creative validation
offer validation
audience testing
tracking confirmation
placement testing
product testing
geography testing
bidding tests

Testing Capital Rule

Testing capital should be defined before launch.

Testing capital should not expand automatically because early results appear promising.

Scaling Capital

Scaling capital is the amount approved to increase exposure after validation.

Scaling capital is separate from testing capital.

Scaling capital should require:

creative graduation
evidence sufficiency
tracking confidence
economic readiness
customer quality
operational capacity
rollback readiness

Scaling Capital Rule

Unused testing capital does not automatically become scaling capital.

Recovery Capital

Recovery capital is reserved for:

payment delays
refund periods
cancellation exposure
temporary performance volatility
platform disruption
fulfilment delay
tracking incidents
corrective testing

Recovery Capital Rule

The advertiser should not commit all available capital to active media spend where reasonable recovery exposure exists.

Reserve Capital

Reserve capital protects the wider business from campaign volatility.

Reserve capital should not be treated as available ad spend without separate approval.

Maximum Approved Exposure

Maximum approved exposure defines the highest acceptable capital at risk during the test period.

It should consider:

media spend
fulfilment exposure
refunds
cancellations
payment delay
inventory
support burden
cash cycle
platform billing
agency or production costs where relevant

Allowable Loss

Allowable loss is the maximum approved negative financial outcome for the test.

Allowable loss should be:

known
approved
recorded
compatible with business survivability
separated from emotional tolerance

Allowable Loss Rule

The system must not continue spending merely because the advertiser hopes performance will improve.

Scope Control

Test scope should match the budget.

Scope dimensions may include:

offers
products
creatives
concepts
iterations
audiences
placements
geographies
campaign roles
optimisation events
landing pages
bidding methods

Scope Dilution Risk

Too many variables sharing too little budget may cause:

insufficient delivery
creative starvation
audience starvation
low conversion opportunity
weak comparison
platform concentration
false negatives
false winners
inconclusive learning

Scope Control Rule

Where budget is insufficient, reduce scope before increasing complexity.

Scope Reduction Options

test fewer creative concepts
test fewer audiences
test fewer products
test fewer geographies
use fewer placements
use one campaign role
use one offer
preserve one funnel
delay advanced bidding tests
delay value optimisation
separate testing phases

Scope Reduction Principle

A smaller valid test is better than a larger invalid test.

Creative Count Governance

Creative count should be matched to:

budget
expected CPA
campaign role
platform delivery behaviour
number of concepts
number of iterations
test duration

Creative Count Risk

Too many creatives may cause:

weak delivery per asset
known winner concentration
new concept starvation
insufficient conversion opportunity
unclear conclusions

Creative Count Rule

Every creative included should have a realistic chance to receive useful delivery.

Audience Count Governance

Audience count should be matched to:

budget
audience size
overlap
expected acquisition cost
test objective
creative count

Audience Count Risk

Too many audience groups may create:

fragmentation
low sample
overlap
weak learning
budget dilution

Audience Count Rule

Each audience test should have enough budget to answer a useful question.

Product And Offer Count Governance

Testing multiple products or offers at once may create:

budget dilution
mixed economics
mixed customer intent
feed concentration
weak product level evidence

Product And Offer Count Rule

The test should include only the number of products or offers the budget can support meaningfully.

Placement Count Governance

Placement coverage should consider:

creative adaptation
platform delivery
budget
device mix
campaign role
evidence requirement

Placement Count Rule

Do not create separate placement tests where the budget cannot support them.

Geography Count Governance

Geographic testing should consider:

budget
currency
fulfilment
shipping
regulation
audience size
language
payout
customer support

Geography Count Rule

Do not combine multiple materially different geographies where commercial interpretation will become unclear.

Conversion Lag Funding

Campaign funding must account for the delay between spend and final outcome.

Possible delays include:

purchase delay
lead qualification delay
booking attendance
sales close
payment settlement
affiliate approval
refund period
cancellation period
repeat purchase

Conversion Lag Risk

A campaign may appear weak before outcomes mature.

A campaign may appear strong before refunds or cancellations mature.

Conversion Lag Funding Rule

The advertiser must have enough capital to operate through the expected decision window without forcing premature conclusions.

Attribution Lag Funding

Attribution systems may report outcomes after the original spend period.

Review windows should account for:

click attribution
view attribution
offline imports
modelled conversions
payment confirmation
source system delay

Attribution Lag Rule

Budget should not be increased merely because recent platform reporting appears incomplete.

Evidence Requirement

Before launch, define what evidence is required.

Possible evidence requirements include:

minimum conversion opportunities
minimum qualified conversions
minimum spend
minimum observation period
minimum reach
minimum creative exposure
minimum audience exposure
minimum tracking confidence
minimum source of truth reconciliation

Evidence Requirement Rule

The evidence requirement should reflect the test question.

Example:

Creative Validation

May require:

sufficient exposure
attention signals
progression signals
controlled delivery

Offer Validation

May require:

qualified conversions
commercial contribution
customer quality

Scaling Readiness

May require:

marginal economics
graduated creative
stable customer quality
operational capacity

Evidence Sufficiency States

Approved states are:

Not Started
Insufficient Evidence
Early Signal
Directional
Repeated
Validated
Contradictory
Revalidation Required

Budget Insufficiency Indicators

A test may be budget insufficient where:

expected conversions are unrealistic
required signal volume cannot be reached
too many creatives share too little spend
too many audiences share too little spend
too many products share too little spend
too many geographies share too little spend
one asset consumes most delivery
the review period is shorter than conversion lag
the allowable loss is below the test requirement
the budget cannot support source versus challenger comparison
tracking repair costs consume the testing allowance
operational capacity is not funded

Readiness Decision Routes

Approved routes are:

Launch
Launch Limited Test
Reduce Scope
Resolve Conditions
Delay Launch
Reject Test
Pause
Revalidate

Launch

Use where readiness, budget and evidence conditions are satisfied.

Launch Limited Test

Use where a narrow controlled test is appropriate.

Reduce Scope

Use where the advertiser is ready but the proposed test is too broad for the available budget.

Resolve Conditions

Use where named issues must be corrected before launch.

Delay Launch

Use where timing, capital, tracking, compliance or operations are temporarily unsuitable.

Reject Test

Use where the proposed test cannot create useful evidence or acceptable risk.

Pause

Use where a launched campaign loses readiness.

Revalidate

Use after material change.

Launch Gate

Before launch, confirm:

campaign role
business goal
offer readiness
funnel readiness
tracking readiness
creative readiness
audience readiness
commercial readiness
operational readiness
compliance readiness
budget sufficiency
allowable loss
evidence requirement
decision authority
rollback rule

Limited Test Gate

A limited test should define:

restricted budget
restricted duration
restricted scope
primary question
evidence requirement
stop condition
next review

Reject Test Rule

A test may be rejected where:

no clear business goal exists
the offer is materially unready
tracking is unusable
the funnel is broken
budget cannot support evidence
commercial economics are unknown
compliance is unresolved
fulfilment is unavailable
customer support is unavailable
allowable loss is unacceptable
the advertiser refuses scope control
the test would create misleading conclusions

Pause Trigger

A launched campaign should be reviewed for pause where:

tracking fails
fulfilment fails
stock fails
compliance risk emerges
budget boundary is reached
customer quality deteriorates
refund or cancellation risk rises
evidence becomes uninterpretable
the advertiser loses operational capacity

Advertiser Readiness Record

Each readiness assessment should record:

advertiser
business
platform
campaign role
business goal
campaign goal
offer
product count
audience count
creative count
placement count
geography count
funnel
conversion event
optimisation objective
tracking confidence
source of truth
expected CPA
expected qualified CPA
break even CPA
target CPA
break even ROAS
target ROAS
contribution margin
refund risk
cancellation risk
conversion lag
attribution lag
testing capital
scaling capital
recovery capital
reserve capital
allowable loss
maximum approved exposure
evidence requirement
test duration
fulfilment readiness
customer support readiness
sales capacity
compliance status
readiness state
unresolved conditions
decision
rollback rule
review date
decision authority
Brain routing

Advertiser Readiness Scorecard

Score each category from 1 to 5:

business goal clarity
campaign role clarity
offer readiness
funnel readiness
tracking readiness
creative readiness
audience readiness
commercial readiness
budget sufficiency
allowable loss clarity
conversion lag funding
attribution lag awareness
evidence requirement clarity
operational readiness
fulfilment readiness
customer support readiness
compliance readiness
decision readiness
rollback readiness
overall launch readiness

The scorecard supports judgement.

It does not replace judgement.

Readiness Revalidation Triggers

Revalidation should occur after:

offer change
price change
payout change
margin change
funnel change
tracking change
creative strategy change
audience strategy change
geography change
product change
fulfilment change
compliance change
budget change
campaign role change
ownership change
platform change
significant time delay

Cross Brain Responsibilities

Ads Brain

Owns:

paid traffic readiness assessment
campaign scope
testing structure
creative and audience readiness
minimum viable budget recommendation
launch recommendation
readiness records

Finance Brain

Owns:

allowable acquisition cost
break even economics
target economics
allowable loss
capital allocation
maximum exposure
cash safety
testing versus scaling capital

Affiliate Brain

Owns:

offer eligibility
traffic permission
payout
commission
program restrictions
offer durability

Experimentation Brain

Owns:

test design
evidence requirement
comparison discipline
sufficient evidence
learning confidence

Conversion Brain

Owns:

funnel readiness
landing page integrity
forms
checkout
booking flow
conversion friction

Data Brain

Owns:

tracking integrity
source of truth
attribution
event quality
reconciliation

Product Brain

Owns:

product readiness
stock
lifecycle
product eligibility
product quality

Customer Brain

Owns:

customer quality
support readiness
refund behaviour
cancellation behaviour
repeat value

Content Brain

Owns:

source creative assets
production readiness
creative capacity
reuse and adaptation support

Compliance Brain

Owns:

platform policy
claims
privacy
consent
audience use
restricted categories

Risk Brain

Owns:

capital risk
operational risk
account risk
brand risk
concentration risk
survivability concerns

HeadOffice

Owns:

cross Brain conflict
strategic exceptions
high consequence launch decisions
governance escalation

Failure Modes Prevented

This framework prevents:

paid traffic launching because an account exists
platform minimums being treated as valid test budgets
universal minimum daily budgets
underfunded campaigns producing false failure conclusions
too many creatives sharing too little spend
too many audiences sharing too little spend
too many products being tested at once
conversion lag being ignored
attribution lag being ignored
testing capital being confused with scaling capital
all available cash being committed to media spend
allowable loss remaining undefined
weak tracking supporting launch
broken funnels receiving paid traffic
unready fulfilment receiving demand
advertisers scaling before controlled validation
emotional hope overriding stop conditions
broad invalid tests replacing narrow valid tests
advertisers refusing scope reduction
campaign launch without decision authority

Drift Protection

The system must prevent:

readiness becoming a checkbox exercise
budget sufficiency becoming a universal dollar amount
external course budgets becoming MWMS rules
platform minimums governing test design
optimistic CPA assumptions inflating scope
hidden operational costs being ignored
conversion lag being shortened for convenience
evidence requirements changing after results appear
testing capital expanding without approval
reserve capital being treated as available spend
technical readiness replacing commercial readiness
commercial readiness replacing compliance readiness
launch pressure bypassing unresolved conditions
campaigns remaining active after readiness is lost

Governance Boundaries

This framework does not authorise:

autonomous campaign launch
autonomous budget approval
autonomous scope reduction
autonomous advertiser rejection
autonomous scaling
autonomous capital transfer
autonomous offer approval
autonomous compliance approval
automatic MCR updates
technical development

Every material action remains subject to human review and the authority of the relevant Brain.

Dynamic Platform Boundary

Platform minimum budgets, learning guidance, billing systems, campaign structures and optimisation requirements may change.

Operational playbooks may record current implementation.

This framework preserves durable advertiser readiness and budget sufficiency governance.

Architectural Intent

The Ads Brain Advertiser Readiness And Minimum Viable Budget Framework exists to ensure MWMS launches paid traffic only when the advertiser can support a valid, interpretable and commercially responsible test.

Its role is to connect:

Business Goal
↓
Advertiser Readiness
↓
Offer And Funnel Readiness
↓
Tracking And Creative Readiness
↓
Commercial Economics
↓
Scope
↓
Minimum Viable Testing Budget
↓
Evidence Requirement
↓
Allowable Loss
↓
Launch Decision

Paid traffic should create evidence.

It should not create confusion from structural unpreparedness.

MWMS therefore treats advertiser readiness and budget sufficiency as launch governance, not administrative preparation.

Version History

Version: v1.0

Date: 2026-07-19

Author: MWMS HeadOffice

Change:

Created Ads Brain Advertiser Readiness And Minimum Viable Budget Framework using the strongest non duplicative advertiser readiness, minimum viable budget, allowable loss, conversion lag and launch scope intelligence absorbed from Sam Piliero The Facebook Ads Blueprint.

Added:

Core Principle
Advertiser Readiness Definition
Advertiser Readiness States
Advertiser Readiness Layers
Strategic Readiness
Offer Readiness
Funnel Readiness
Tracking Readiness
Creative Readiness
Audience Readiness
Commercial Readiness
Operational Readiness
Compliance Readiness
Decision Readiness
Minimum Viable Testing Budget
Minimum Viable Budget Rule
Budget Sufficiency Formula Logic
Platform Minimum Versus MWMS Minimum
Testing Capital
Scaling Capital
Recovery Capital
Reserve Capital
Maximum Approved Exposure
Allowable Loss
Scope Control
Scope Dilution Risk
Scope Reduction Options
Scope Reduction Principle
Creative Count Governance
Audience Count Governance
Product And Offer Count Governance
Placement Count Governance
Geography Count Governance
Conversion Lag Funding
Attribution Lag Funding
Evidence Requirement
Evidence Sufficiency States
Budget Insufficiency Indicators
Readiness Decision Routes
Launch Gate
Limited Test Gate
Reject Test Rule
Pause Trigger
Advertiser Readiness Record
Advertiser Readiness Scorecard
Readiness Revalidation Triggers
Cross Brain Responsibilities
Failure Modes Prevented
Drift Protection
Governance Boundaries
Dynamic Platform Boundary

Clarified:

advertiser readiness is broader than technical account setup
minimum viable budget is based on evidence requirements rather than platform minimums
a small budget is valid only when scope and evidence needs remain compatible
testing capital, scaling capital, recovery capital and reserve capital are separate
allowable loss must be approved before launch
conversion and attribution lag require sufficient funding
a narrow valid test is better than a broad invalid test
too many creatives, audiences, products or geographies can invalidate learning
campaigns may launch, launch as limited tests, reduce scope, delay or be rejected
launch readiness must be revalidated after material change

Pages Created:

Ads Brain Advertiser Readiness And Minimum Viable Budget Framework

Pages Updated:

None

Pages Deprecated:

None

Registry Requiring Update:

Ads Brain Page Registry

Required Registry Change:

Add Ads Brain Advertiser Readiness And Minimum Viable Budget Framework as an Active Ads Brain Framework at version v1.0 under Ads Brain Canon.

System Map Update Required:

Yes

Required System Map Change:

Connect the framework with Ads Brain Campaign Goal And Measurement Governance Framework, Ads Brain Conversion Tracking And Signal Integrity Framework, Ads Brain Creative Testing Structure Framework, Ads Brain Audience Experimentation Framework, Ads Brain Catalogue Advertising And Product Feed Governance Framework, Ads Brain Cost Control And Bidding Governance Framework, Ads Brain Scaling Intelligence, Finance Brain, Affiliate Brain, Experimentation Brain, Conversion Brain, Data Brain, Product Brain, Customer Brain, Content Brain, Compliance Brain and Risk Brain.

Canon Version Update Required:

Change Log Entry Required:

Yes

END OF FULL FILE OUTPUT