Document Type: Specification
Status: Draft
Version: v1.0
Authority: HeadOffice
Applies To: Affiliate Brain, Experimentation Brain, Finance Brain, and HeadOffice governance oversight
Parent: HeadOffice
Last Reviewed: 2026-04-05
Purpose
This page defines the high-level decision structure that connects Affiliate Brain, Experimentation Brain, Finance Brain, and HeadOffice into one governed decision engine inside MWMS.
Its purpose is to show how these Brains operate together when evaluating opportunities, interpreting signal confidence, controlling capital exposure, and determining whether testing or scaling may proceed.
This page exists to remove fragmentation between separate Brain documents and establish a single cross-brain overview for decision flow.
It makes clear:
- what each Brain contributes
- how decision logic moves between Brains
- where confidence enters the system
- where capital discipline enters the system
- where HeadOffice oversight sits
- how the system behaves as one governed structure rather than isolated documents
This page does not replace Brain-specific canon or internal Brain frameworks.
It defines the integrated overview layer above them.
Scope
This page applies to:
- cross-brain decision logic involving Affiliate Brain, Experimentation Brain, Finance Brain, and HeadOffice
- opportunity evaluation entering structured testing
- signal interpretation entering confidence review
- capital request readiness entering financial review
- progression from opportunity evaluation toward testing, continuation, scaling, or rejection
- HeadOffice oversight over combined decision logic
This page governs the structural overview of the decision relationship between these Brains.
It does not by itself govern:
- Affiliate Brain internal offer evaluation details
- Experimentation Brain statistical frameworks by themselves
- Finance Brain capital governance rules by themselves
- SIT enforcement logic by itself
- schema implementation by itself
- plugin execution by itself
- task executor behaviour by itself
Those remain governed by the relevant Brain canon, standards, protocols, and implementation documents.
Definition / Rules
Core Principle
MWMS decision quality depends on multiple governed inputs.
No single Brain should determine test progression or capital exposure in isolation.
The integrated decision engine operates through four distinct roles:
- Affiliate Brain evaluates opportunity readiness
- Experimentation Brain evaluates signal confidence
- Finance Brain evaluates capital survivability
- HeadOffice oversees combined decision direction
This prevents isolated decision making and preserves governance discipline.
Decision Structure Overview
The high-level flow is:
Opportunity enters Affiliate Brain
↓
Affiliate Brain evaluates structural test readiness
↓
Experimentation Brain evaluates signal confidence and evidence quality
↓
Finance Brain evaluates capital exposure and survivability limits
↓
HeadOffice reviews combined decision context where required
↓
System outcome is determined
Possible system outcomes include:
- proceed to controlled test
- continue gathering evidence
- pause pending stronger confidence
- block due to capital discipline
- reject opportunity
- escalate to HeadOffice
- qualify for controlled progression
- qualify for scaling review
Affiliate Brain Role
Affiliate Brain is responsible for opportunity-side interpretation.
Its role in the integrated decision engine includes:
- assessing whether the offer or opportunity is structurally suitable for testing
- determining whether hooks, inputs, and opportunity conditions are ready for controlled test entry
- interpreting business-side signals relevant to opportunity viability
- determining whether a capital request is justified at the opportunity level
- forwarding structured evaluation into the wider decision chain
Affiliate Brain does not determine statistical confidence alone.
Affiliate Brain does not approve capital alone.
Affiliate Brain does not override HeadOffice.
Experimentation Brain Role
Experimentation Brain is responsible for signal confidence interpretation.
Its role in the integrated decision engine includes:
- evaluating whether available results carry enough signal strength
- interpreting whether observed outcomes justify confidence
- classifying whether evidence is weak, emerging, usable, or strong
- determining whether progression is justified from a signal-quality perspective
- preventing advancement based on weak or contaminated evidence
Experimentation Brain does not decide opportunity desirability by itself.
Experimentation Brain does not authorise capital by itself.
Finance Brain Role
Finance Brain is responsible for survivability and capital discipline.
Its role in the integrated decision engine includes:
- evaluating whether proposed testing or progression fits survivability boundaries
- assessing whether capital exposure is acceptable
- determining whether financial risk exceeds allowed tolerance
- blocking movement where capital discipline would be violated
- preserving the rule that survival outranks expansion
Finance Brain does not determine creative quality.
Finance Brain does not determine opportunity desirability by itself.
HeadOffice Role
HeadOffice is responsible for system-level oversight.
Its role in the integrated decision engine includes:
- maintaining visibility over combined cross-brain decisions
- resolving disagreement between Brain outputs
- intervening where system direction, governance, or material exposure requires oversight
- ensuring local Brain convenience does not override MWMS-wide good
- preserving coherent decision flow across the ecosystem
HeadOffice does not replace the internal working role of each Brain.
HeadOffice governs the combined structure.
Integrated Decision Logic
The integrated decision engine must combine three governed inputs:
Opportunity Readiness
from Affiliate Brain
Signal Confidence
from Experimentation Brain
Capital Discipline
from Finance Brain
The system should not treat any one of these as sufficient on its own.
Correct interpretation is:
- strong opportunity with weak confidence is not enough
- strong confidence with unacceptable capital exposure is not enough
- acceptable capital exposure without opportunity quality is not enough
Progression quality depends on combined alignment.
Decision Categories
The integrated decision engine may produce the following categories:
Proceed to Controlled Test
Used when:
- Affiliate Brain confirms opportunity readiness
- Experimentation Brain confirms usable confidence basis for entry
- Finance Brain confirms acceptable exposure
Hold for More Evidence
Used when:
- opportunity may be viable
- confidence is not yet strong enough
- more testing or evidence is required before progression
Blocked by Capital Discipline
Used when:
- opportunity or evidence may be promising
- but financial exposure violates survivability rules
Rejected
Used when:
- opportunity quality is structurally weak
- confidence logic does not support progression
- or the combined case is not sufficient for continuation
Escalated to HeadOffice
Used when:
- Brain outputs materially conflict
- system-level judgement is required
- governance implications exceed local authority
Qualified for Progression Review
Used when:
- test stage conditions have been met
- evidence and opportunity quality justify next-stage review
- capital conditions remain within bounds
Cross Brain Dependency Principle
The system must behave as a dependency chain, not a collection of unrelated pages.
Affiliate Brain depends on Experimentation Brain to validate signal quality.
Affiliate Brain depends on Finance Brain to validate capital exposure.
Finance Brain may depend on HeadOffice when strategic context or system-wide judgement is required.
HeadOffice depends on visible structured outputs rather than informal interpretation.
This dependency structure makes the decision engine governable.
Visibility Principle
All meaningful cross-brain decision movement should remain visible to HeadOffice.
This does not require HeadOffice to manually approve every movement.
It requires the combined decision chain to remain:
- reviewable
- interpretable
- traceable
- escalation-ready
This aligns with the MWMS Brain to Brain Request Protocol.
Relationship to Other MWMS Standards
This page operates alongside:
- How to Start a Session MWMS Operating Guide
- AI Session Context Lock Rule
- Brain Routing Rule
- AI Output Standard Full File Delivery Rule
- MWMS Brain to Brain Request Protocol
- relevant Affiliate Brain, Experimentation Brain, and Finance Brain canon pages
This page acts as the top-level integration view, not a replacement for those pages.
Drift Protection
The system must prevent:
- Affiliate Brain making isolated progression decisions without confidence review
- Experimentation Brain confidence signals being treated as sufficient without capital discipline
- Finance Brain being bypassed when capital exposure exists
- HeadOffice losing visibility over major cross-brain decisions
- cross-brain logic being scattered across disconnected pages with no unified overview
- progression decisions being made from convenience rather than combined governed inputs
If opportunity readiness, signal confidence, and capital discipline are not jointly considered, the decision engine becomes structurally weak.
Architectural Intent
This page exists to establish the first clean integrated overview of the MWMS decision engine.
Its purpose is not to create implementation detail.
Its purpose is to make the system understandable as a governed cross-brain structure.
This allows future pages to sit beneath a clear top-level logic.
The intended architecture is:
HeadOffice oversees
Affiliate interprets opportunity
Experimentation interprets confidence
Finance protects survivability
Together they form one decision engine.
Change Log
Version: v1.0
Date: 2026-04-05
Author: HeadOffice
Change: Initial creation of HeadOffice Cross Brain Decision Overview establishing the high-level integrated decision structure linking Affiliate Brain, Experimentation Brain, Finance Brain, and HeadOffice oversight.